Access to Micro-finance & Rural Credit for Entrepreneurship

Author: Anupam Jana, Research Intern, BNSK-Bharat 1. Introduction: Micro-finance, often referred to as microcredit, refers to financial services offered to individuals or small groups who are traditionally excluded from conventional banking services due to their low or irregular income, lack of collateral, or geographic isolation. In India, these services typically include microloans under ₹1 lakh, insurance, access to savings accounts, and other financial products that enable self-employment, small-scale enterprise, or economic stabilization (Budampati & Reddy, 2024). The foundational aim of microfinance is to provide economically vulnerable individuals - especially in rural and semi-rural areas - with the tools they need to participate in income-generating activities and build a financially secure future. According to Jaya Jagriti and Dr. Bablu Kumar (2023), this mechanism helps them break free from the clutches of informal moneylenders who often charge exorbitant interest rates and push borrowers into long-term indebtedness. In rural India, microfinance has proven especially transformative. It has allowed entrepreneurs to initiate or expand microenterprises, enabled farmers to invest in productive assets, and helped families cope with unexpected financial shocks. These ripple effects contribute not only to household-level economic stability but also to wider community development (Sri K. Vasudeva Rao, 2023).

One of the most celebrated microfinance models is the Grameen Model, pioneered in Bangladesh and successfully replicated in India. Under this model, women - who are often excluded from financial decision-making - form small borrower groups that provide mutual support and peer accountability. This group-based lending approach, which requires no collateral, has been particularly effective in improving repayment rates and reducing the risk of default, while also promoting social cohesion and financial empowerment (Neha Juneja, 2024). Moreover, microfinance has proven to be a gender-sensitive intervention by empowering women to take ownership of household finances, make informed decisions, and contribute actively to their families’ incomes. As women gain financial independence, the benefits spill over into better health, education, and nutrition outcomes for entire households, creating a multiplier effect that boosts human development indices at the grassroots level. In short, microfinance is not just a loan mechanism; it is a driver of empowerment, poverty reduction, and entrepreneurial energy. However, for it to truly fulfil this potential, there is a need for a well-aligned ecosystem of policies, capacity-building, consumer protection mechanisms, and awareness initiatives that support borrowers throughout their journey from credit access to enterprise growth. A clear understanding of the legal and regulatory architecture of India’s microfinance sector is essential to assess how credit access is enabled — or restricted — for rural entrepreneurs. 2. Legal and Policy Framework

Types of Microfinance Institutions (MFIs)	Legal Acts under which Registered
1) Not-for-Profit MFIs (a) NGO - MFIs (b) Non-profit Companies	a) Societies Registration Act, 1860 or similar Provincial Acts Indian Trust Act, 1882 b) Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956
2) Mutual Benefit MFIs (a) Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies (MACS) and similarly set up institutions	Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act enacted by State Government
3) For Profit MFIs (a)Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs)	Indian Companies Act, 1956 Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934

Source: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India India’s microfinance sector has evolved into one of the most dynamic segments of the financial services industry, with significant implications for rural credit and entrepreneurship. Historically, the sector experienced exponential growth - averaging over 50% annually in the early 2010s (Prakash Singh, 2010–11) - attracting interest from private investors, philanthropic organizations, and formal financial institutions. Today, microfinance in India is delivered through a diverse set of intermediaries, including NGO-MFIs, cooperative societies, Section 8 companies, Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs), Small Finance Banks (SFBs), and both public and private sector banks, all functioning under distinct legal and regulatory frameworks (ICAI). However, the absence of a unified legal framework has historically led to jurisdictional ambiguity. While MFIs fall under the Union List of the Indian Constitution and are regulated primarily by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), some state governments classify them as moneylenders under the State List, leading to regulatory fragmentation (Manisha Raj, 2011). To address these inconsistencies, the RBI has taken progressive steps — notably the recognition of Self-Regulatory Organizations (MFIN and Sa-Dhan) in 2014 and the introduction of a unified regulatory framework for all regulated entities engaged in microfinance in 2022 (SIDBI, 2013; RBI, 2022).

Recent data reflects the sector’s sustained momentum. As of March 2024, India’s gross microfinance loan portfolio stood at ₹4.33 lakh crore, serving over 7.8 crore borrowers, with NBFC-MFIs continuing to hold the largest share (MFIN, 2024). Notably, outreach in Aspirational Districts saw a 23% year-on-year increase, underscoring the sector’s role in inclusive development (SIDBI, 2024). Moreover, technology-enabled platforms - including digital KYC, AI-driven credit scoring, and mobile lending apps - are transforming the way financial services are delivered, improving operational efficiency and expanding access in underserved regions. The microfinance sector is projected to grow at a CAGR of 12.58% from 2024 to 2034, driven by a favorable policy environment and increasing digitization (EvolveBI, 2024).

These developments are particularly significant for rural entrepreneurship, where access to timely and affordable credit remains a cornerstone for initiating and sustaining micro-enterprises. Thus, while institutional innovation and regulatory coherence have enhanced sectoral governance, a well-aligned ecosystem comprising supportive policy, borrower awareness, and consumer protection mechanisms is essential to ensure that microfinance fulfills its broader developmental mandate. 2.1 Key Features and Limitations of the 2022 Unified Framework: 1. A cap on household loan repayments, limiting outflow to a maximum of 50% of the household income.

2. Elimination of collateral and prepayment penalties.

3. Flexibility in repayment frequency to accommodate seasonal income flows.

4. Emphasis on fair lending practices and borrower protection (ENS Economic Bureau, 2021).

These provisions are aimed at protecting borrowers from over-indebtedness, enhancing transparency in lending, and ensuring that credit is provided in a manner that is both sustainable and equitable (Aditya Bhan, 2024). However, regulatory gaps still persist - especially concerning NGO-MFIs that are not subject to comprehensive microfinance specific regulations. These organizations are typically registered under state-level Trust or Society Acts and lack a uniform framework that governs their micro-lending activities. As noted by the World Bank (2006), this creates operational inconsistencies, especially in credit risk assessment, pricing, and recovery practices. Furthermore, due to the absence of a single regulatory statute that covers all MFIs uniformly, many small-scale lenders continue to operate outside the regulatory radar, potentially putting borrowers at risk. This scenario underscores the need for a robust institutional framework that harmonizes central and state-level policies, ensures consumer protection, and promotes transparency in MFI operations. To enable long-term sustainability, it is essential that policymakers establish mechanisms to integrate unregulated entities into the formal financial system without compromising the agility that makes microfinance so effective at the grassroots level.

3. Rising Impact of Microfinance in India: A Decade of Growth and Resilience (2013–2023)

Fig.1 : Microfinance loan disbursements in India surged 7x from ₹25,796 crore in 2013 to ₹1,72,765 crore in 2023, highlighting its growing role in financial inclusion (Source: Sa-Dhan Database).

The graph depicts the trend of loan disbursement by Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) in India over the period from 2013 to 2023, showing a general upward trajectory with occasional fluctuations. Starting from ₹25,796 crore in 2013, the amount steadily increased in the following years, reaching ₹38,558 crore in 2014, ₹56,860 crore in 2015, and peaking at ₹72,345 crore in 2016. However, in 2017 there was a noticeable decline to ₹52,447 crore, possibly due to the aftereffects of demonetization in late 2016 which disrupted cash flows in the informal sector. This dip was followed by a significant recovery in 2018, when disbursements rose to ₹81,737 crore and continued to grow to ₹109,804 crore in 2019. In 2020, there was a slight decline to ₹106,404 crore, which further dipped to ₹81,647 crore in 2021, likely reflecting the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related lockdowns that constrained microfinance operations and borrower repayment capacities. The sector bounced back in 2022 with ₹113,210 crore disbursed and witnessed a dramatic surge in 2023, reaching ₹172,765 crore, indicating a strong recovery, expansion in outreach, and growing demand for microcredit, particularly in underserved and economically vulnerable communities. Overall, the trend underscores the growing role of MFIs in financial inclusion and the resilience of the sector despite external shocks.

Fig. 2: Microfinance in India saw uneven growth (2016–2023), with J&K growing 1700% and Tripura & Jharkhand over 400%, while saturated states like Karnataka saw stagnation (Source: Sa-Dhan Database). This bar graph illustrates the percentage growth in micro loan disbursement across various Indian states and union territories between the years 2016 and 2023, highlighting regional disparities in microfinance expansion over the period. While most states show a positive growth trajectory, the extent of growth varies significantly. Jammu & Kashmir stands out with an exceptionally high growth rate, exceeding 1700%, indicating a dramatic scale-up in microfinance activity, possibly from a very low base in 2016. Other states with notable growth include Tripura, Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, and Jharkhand, each showing growth well above 400%, suggesting expanding outreach of microfinance institutions in northeastern and underserved regions. States like Odisha, Rajasthan, and Goa also saw substantial increases. In contrast, some states like Karnataka and Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu registered negative growth, pointing to either a contraction in disbursement or a market saturation or shift. Relatively mature markets such as Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, and Uttar Pradesh witnessed moderate growth, likely due to already established MFI operations. The data reflects both successful financial inclusion efforts in newer geographies and stagnation or regression in certain others, underscoring the need for region-specific strategies to enhance microfinance penetration and ensure balanced financial development across the country.

4. Systemic Challenges and Analytical Reflections on Microfinance and Rural Credit Access Despite substantial progress in expanding microfinance outreach in rural India, persistent challenges continue to constrain the sector’s effectiveness in promoting sustainable rural entrepreneurship. These challenges are systemic, behavioral, and institutional, necessitating coordinated policy reforms and organizational innovation.

A primary barrier remains financial illiteracy among rural populations. A significant proportion of rural borrowers lack adequate understanding of financial products, loan terms, and repayment obligations (Taruna & Yadav, 2016). This knowledge gap limits their capacity to make informed credit decisions and utilize financial services optimally for entrepreneurial ventures. Therefore, targeted borrower education and awareness programs are crucial to empower rural entrepreneurs and reduce vulnerability to misinformation and exploitative lending.

Over-indebtedness is another critical concern. Microloans, intended to be small and manageable, are often associated with higher effective interest rates compared to traditional banking products. Coupled with the practice of multiple borrowing from different microfinance institutions (MFIs), this leads to unsustainable debt burdens that threaten entrepreneurial viability (Rural Development Ministry, 2012; IIT Kanpur, 2011). The 2010 Andhra Pradesh microfinance crisis remains a seminal event illustrating the severe consequences of unchecked lending and recovery practices, including borrower distress and social unrest (Nair, 2012). While the crisis prompted significant regulatory reforms aimed at protecting borrowers, recent sectoral assessments indicate that issues such as over-indebtedness and credit fragmentation persist in various pockets, requiring ongoing oversight and enhanced credit information sharing.

The dependence of MFIs on commercial bank funding, especially from private banks, imposes additional constraints. With approximately 80% of funds sourced from banks that demand stringent repayment terms and impose higher interest costs, MFIs face limited operational flexibility (Saleh & Ahamad, 2023). This financial dependence often pressures MFIs to prioritize short-term recovery over long-term developmental objectives aligned with entrepreneurial growth.

Another salient gap is the limited integration of insurance products within microfinance portfolios. Rural entrepreneurs face frequent income shocks from crop failures, health emergencies, and natural calamities, which can devastate their businesses. However, most microfinance programs continue to emphasize credit and savings while underutilizing insurance as a risk mitigation strategy (Nasir, 2013). Expanding insurance coverage is essential to build resilience and safeguard rural entrepreneurial ventures.

Furthermore, technology adoption among smaller MFIs remains uneven, hindering efficient loan processing, risk management, and borrower monitoring. In the digital era, enhancing technological infrastructure can improve transparency, reduce operational costs, and facilitate scalable delivery of credit services, thereby broadening access for rural entrepreneurs.

Lastly, many microfinance schemes still lack gender-responsive design. Since women constitute the majority of microfinance clients in rural India, credit products and capacity-building programs must address gender-specific constraints such as limited mobility, household responsibilities, and restricted asset ownership. Tailoring services to these realities is vital to unlock the full entrepreneurial potential of women borrowers.

In summary, achieving meaningful and sustainable access to microfinance and rural credit for entrepreneurship demands a holistic approach. This includes enhancing financial literacy, promoting responsible lending, diversifying funding sources, integrating insurance solutions, leveraging digital technologies, and adopting gender-sensitive frameworks. Only through addressing these interconnected challenges can the microfinance sector continue to foster inclusive rural entrepreneurship and socio-economic development in 2025 and beyond. 5. Strategic Policy Framework and Best Practices for Advancing Rural Microfinance

To harness the full potential of microfinance as an instrument of inclusive development and rural entrepreneurship in India, a comprehensive, multidimensional policy framework is imperative. Despite notable progress under the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) harmonized regulatory norms, the legal and institutional environment for microfinance institutions (MFIs) remains fragmented and uneven. As suggested by Dr. Sanjeeb Kumar Dey (2015), the enactment of a comprehensive national microfinance law would consolidate existing frameworks, bring NGO-MFIs under formal regulatory oversight, and reduce jurisdictional ambiguities between central and state governments. Such a unified legal infrastructure would institutionalize borrower protection, enhance transparency, and establish uniform operational standards across all MFIs.

Financial literacy remains a critical area of intervention, especially given the low levels of awareness among rural borrowers regarding credit terms, savings instruments, and digital platforms. Budampati and Reddy (2024), as well as Rizvi (2025), argue for embedding financial literacy modules into the routine operations of MFIs, with active support from institutions like NABARD and State Rural Livelihood Missions. These modules should not only address traditional financial education but also emphasize digital onboarding, grievance redressal, and customer rights in vernacular languages.

Moreover, MFIs must be repositioned not merely as credit providers, but as development enablers. Dr. Sushama Sharma (2018) recommends the adoption of a tiered lending model wherein first-time borrowers receive small, group-based loans, while repeat borrowers with sound credit histories are graduated to larger, individual loans with flexible terms. This approach not only incentivizes responsible repayment behaviour but also supports the scalability of rural enterprises. In addition to credit, the financial service portfolio of MFIs should include micro-insurance, pension products, remittance services, and emergency loans to meet the life-cycle financial needs of rural households (Nasir, 2013). Targeted public subsidies—such as interest subvention and credit guarantees—should be reserved for ultra-poor households and first-generation entrepreneurs, and their disbursal must be performance-linked to avoid market distortion (Robinson, 2001).

Another critical dimension is capacity building, which must accompany financial inclusion to ensure sustainable livelihood generation. Harvard International Review (2025) highlights the exemplary models of Kudumbashree and SEWA, where microfinance has been effectively integrated with entrepreneurship development, market linkages, and mentorship—especially empowering women-led enterprises. Additionally, institutional capacity-building programs for small and mid-sized MFIs are necessary to improve governance, risk management, and compliance with ethical lending practices.

Technological integration is equally vital to enhance outreach, reduce operational costs, and strengthen monitoring systems. Mobile applications, biometric authentication, and alternative credit scoring systems can facilitate real-time loan tracking, client onboarding, and portfolio risk analysis. However, as noted by Chakraborty et al. (2018), digital transformation must be complemented by robust data protection frameworks to ensure borrower privacy and cybersecurity, especially in underserved areas. Social performance ratings, alongside financial indicators, should be adopted to assess the true developmental impact of microfinance. Metrics such as income enhancement, women’s empowerment, outreach to marginalized communities, and enterprise sustainability should guide regulatory oversight and MFI accountability.

India must also draw lessons from international experiences to strengthen its policy orientation. The European Code of Good Conduct for Microcredit Providers, as endorsed by the European Commission (2022), provides a valuable template for ethical lending, client protection, and institutional governance. Aligning with such global standards can enhance India's credibility and bring domestic practices in line with international benchmarks. Furthermore, convergence between government schemes - such as DAY-NRLM, MUDRA Yojana, and the SHG–Bank Linkage Programme - and private CSR initiatives can optimize resources and prevent duplication. Public–private partnerships can accelerate financial inclusion through shared infrastructure and co-created delivery models.

Finally, the integration of microfinance with climate resilience and environmental sustainability goals is an emerging priority. MFIs should be encouraged to design green credit products that promote renewable energy adoption, organic farming, and climate-adaptive enterprises in rural areas.

In conclusion, these policy recommendations form a strategic framework for transforming the microfinance ecosystem in India. The aim should not be to merely expand the volume of credit, but to lend more intelligently, with empathy, accountability, and developmental foresight. As we look toward a more inclusive and resilient rural economy, microfinance must evolve as a holistic enabler of social and economic empowerment. 6. Conclusion India’s aspiration to become a $5 trillion economy and a global leader in inclusive development hinges significantly on its ability to address rural poverty, underemployment, and financial exclusion. With over 260 million people still living below the poverty line and a significant portion of the workforce engaged in the informal sector, financial inclusion is not merely a policy goal - it is a foundational prerequisite for sustainable development (Devaraja T.S., 2011).

Microfinance has emerged as a vital instrument in this pursuit. It offers more than access to credit; it enables rural individuals - particularly women—to transition from subsistence livelihoods to income-generating activities, fostering self-reliance and resilience. Through group-based lending models, micro-savings, and social capital, microfinance institutions (MFIs) have facilitated upward mobility in rural India. The ripple effects of these interventions - improved nutrition, higher school attendance, better health outcomes, and enhanced household stability - underscore microfinance’s role in promoting multidimensional well being (Jagriti & Kumar, 2023).

However, the sector’s journey has not been without turbulence. While it has democratized credit and reached previously unbanked populations, episodes such as the 2010 Andhra Pradesh crisis exposed structural deficiencies - ranging from coercive recovery practices and over-indebtedness to inadequate regulatory oversight (Nair, 2012). These challenges highlight the need for a more transparent, ethical, and professionally governed microfinance ecosystem.

The path forward requires microfinance to evolve from a narrow credit-centric model to a comprehensive rural development platform. This entails integrating microfinance with skill development programs, social protection schemes, digital financial services, and value-chain linkages. By addressing multiple dimensions of rural vulnerability—including health insecurity, market access barriers, and gender-based constraints - microfinance can play a transformative role in building inclusive and shock-resilient communities (Harvard International Review, 2025).

In this transformation, the role of the state is pivotal. A supportive regulatory environment, digital infrastructure investment, and synergy with government initiatives like NRLM and PM SVANidhi can significantly enhance the impact of microfinance. Furthermore, institutions must prioritize financial literacy, client protection, responsible lending, and rigorous impact evaluation. Performance-based assessment frameworks and tech-enabled service delivery can ensure that outreach does not compromise sustainability or ethics (Vision of Microfinance in India, 2019).

In conclusion, while microfinance is not a panacea for all rural development challenges, it remains an indispensable tool in India’s inclusive growth strategy. When embedded within a robust ecosystem of public support, ethical governance, and borrower-centric innovation, microfinance can catalyze an entrepreneurially vibrant, socially empowered, and economically resilient rural India. To truly realize the promise of inclusive development, India must ensure that no aspiring entrepreneur - however small - is left behind. 7. References: 1. Budampati, R. & Reddy, P., 2024. Access to Microfinance and Rural Credit for Entrepreneurship. Economic & Political Weekly, 59(1), pp.34-50.

2. Jagriti, J. & Kumar, B., 2023. Microfinance and Rural Women Empowerment. Journal of Rural Development, 42(3), pp.112-125.

3. Sri. K. Vasudeva Rao, 2023. Microfinance and its Role in Rural Economic Development. Indian Journal of Finance, 58(2), pp. 78-92.

4. Neha Juneja, 2024. Women Empowerment Through the Grameen Model of Microfinance. Journal of Social Welfare Studies, 61(4), pp. 45-60.

5. Prakash Singh, 2010-11. The Growth of India's Microfinance Sector: Opportunities and Challenges. Economic Affairs, 55(3), pp. 27-42.

6. NABARD, 2020-21. Status of Microfinance in India. Government of India.

7. Rural Development Ministry, 2012. Challenges in Microfinance Sector in India. Government of India.

8. Manisha Raj, 2011. Regulatory Framework for Microfinance in India, in Singh, A. (ed.), Microfinance: A Pathway to Financial Inclusion. Delhi: Sage Publications.

9. World Bank, 2006. Microfinance in India: Issues and Challenges. Washington D.C.: World Bank.

10. SIDBI, August 2013. Microfinance Sector in India: Challenges and Opportunities. Small Industries Development Bank of India.

11. Reserve Bank of India, 2021. New Regulatory Framework for Microfinance Institutions. Available at: www.rbi.org.in [Accessed 22 March 2025].

12. ENS Economic Bureau, 2021. RBI's New Microfinance Framework: Key Takeaways. The Indian Express. 13. Dr. Taruna & Yadav, P., 2016. Financial Literacy Challenges in India. Journal of Finance and Economics, 10(2), pp. 58-71.

14. Saleh, M. & Ahamad, S., 2023. Financial Dependence of Indian MFIs on Commercial Banks. Asian Journal of Economics and Business Studies, 17(4), pp. 92-108.

15. IIT Kanpur, 2011. Impact of Multiple Lending on Over-Indebtedness. IIT Kanpur Research Publication.

16. Sibghatullah Nasir, 2013. The Role of Insurance in Microfinance Programs in India. Indian Journal of Insurance Studies, 9(1), pp. 12-27.

17. Dr. Sanjeeb Kumar Dey, 2015. The Regulatory Framework for India's Microfinance Sector. Journal of Financial Policy, 7(4), pp. 189-202.

18. Khusbu Verma et al., 2020. Microfinance Awareness in Rural India. Journal of Rural Development Studies, 15(2), pp. 67-80.

19. Dr. Sushama Sharma, 2018. Women Entrepreneurs and Access to Finance in Rural India. Journal of Business Innovation, 21(3), pp. 89-105.

20. Harvard International Review, 2025. Empowering Women through Microfinance: Challenges and Solutions. Harvard International Review, 41(1), pp. 30-45.

21. Aishik Chakraborty et al., 2018. Transforming MFIs into Sustainable Enterprises, in Patel, R. (ed.), Microfinance in Emerging Economies. Mumbai: Pearson Publications.

22. Robinson, M.S., 2001. The Microfinance Revolution: Sustainable Finance for the Poor. Washington D.C.: World Bank Publications.

23. Publications Office of the European Union, 2022. European Code of Good Conduct for Microcredit Provision. Brussels: EU Publications.

24. Devaraja T.S., 2011. Poverty Alleviation and Microfinance in India. Bangalore University Research Publication.